Market comparison

Historical FTSE 100 vs STI dividend comparison

This comparison focuses on how the stored June 2026 United Kingdom and Singapore benchmark snapshots differ in tracked-company count, payer share, gross-yield fields, median-yield fields, and payout-frequency mix.

Comparison thesis

What this comparison is testing

This comparison focuses on how the stored June 2026 United Kingdom and Singapore benchmark snapshots differ in tracked-company count, payer share, gross-yield fields, median-yield fields, and payout-frequency mix.

Data observation that triggered this page: The available snapshot fields support a dated benchmark-level comparison of constituent count, payer count, payer share, gross yield, median yield, and the largest payout-frequency group. They do not establish current conditions because the underlying dataset is now historical.

Side-by-side benchmark snapshot

The table below uses the stored DividendTen benchmark fields only. It does not add live prices, newer company events, forecasts, or external analyst views.

Scroll horizontally to compare each benchmark field.

FTSE 100 vs STI dividend comparison using DividendTen benchmark snapshot data as of Jun 2026. Units are percentages for yield and payer-share fields.
Benchmark field FTSE 100Straits Times Index
Country or market United KingdomSingapore
Tracked companies 10030
Companies marked as dividend payers in the preceding twelve-month period 9128
Payer share 91%93%
Gross dividend-yield snapshot 3.72%4.31%
Median dividend-yield snapshot 3.05%3.41%
Largest payout-frequency group Quarterly, 45% of dividend-paying rows in the snapshotSemi-annual, 61% of dividend-paying rows in the snapshot

What the comparison can show

It can compare the shape of one dated benchmark snapshot: tracked-company count, payer coverage fields, gross-yield and median-yield fields, and the largest payout-frequency category.

It can also help a reader decide which deeper dated page to inspect next, such as a dividend calendar, payout-frequency table, market hub, glossary definition, or methodology note.

What the comparison cannot show

It cannot establish future returns, payout sustainability, dividend safety, current company announcements, tax outcomes, currency-adjusted income, or suitability of any security.

Because the June 2026 dataset is now historical, this page also cannot establish present benchmark conditions. Verify newer values whenever current market facts are needed.

Market caveats

  • United Kingdom dividend pages can require special-dividend and interim-versus-final context. Singapore pages can require REIT and trust-distribution context. Those differences limit direct interpretation of one aggregate yield field.
  • The June 2026 figures are historical snapshot data. Verify newer values against appropriate issuer, exchange/index, or properly licensed sources before current factual use.

Common interpretation mistake

The most common mistake is reading a higher stored gross-yield field as a better market, safer income stream, or stronger future return. A yield snapshot is a dated ratio and must be read together with source/freshness status, payment context, payout frequency, and market-specific caveats.

Methodology and related pages

Read the DividendTen methodology, data verification policy, and site disclaimer before reusing any comparison field. For definitions, start with dividend yield, gross dividend yield, and payment date.

Contextual DividendTen links: FTSE 100 market hubSTI market hubSpecial dividend explainedDividend suspension definition

This comparison is educational research context. The underlying Jun 2026 benchmark dataset is historical and is published with visible source and methodology caveats.